Wi-Fi specialists — we survey it, design it, install it, and prove it works.
Home / Wi-Fi surveys

Commercial Wi-Fi surveys

A Wi-Fi survey turns radio behaviour into a design you can build from and a number you can budget against. We run predictive, on-site and validation surveys on Ekahau across UK commercial sites — and then we install what the survey specifies.

Survey-ledEvery design starts with measured data
Ekahau-basedSurveys run on industry-standard tooling
In-house installCabling and installation by our own teams
Coverage guaranteeWritten thresholds, validated on completion
UK-wideCommercial sites across the country

What a Wi-Fi survey actually is

A Wi-Fi survey is a measurement exercise. Radio does not behave the way a floorplan suggests: a stud wall costs you a few decibels, a lift shaft costs you most of a signal, and a warehouse full of steel racking behaves like a completely different building once the pallets are in. A survey establishes what the radio environment is really doing, and turns that into a design — where the access points go, what they transmit at, which channels they use, how many devices each one can carry, and what cabling has to reach them.

It is not a walk round with a phone app. Phone apps report signal strength as their own radio sees it, at floor level, in one direction, with no view of noise, interference, retry rates or how the network will behave when four hundred people arrive at nine o'clock. A survey uses calibrated, survey-grade equipment, a scaled plan of the building, and a surveyor who knows what the numbers mean.

A survey tripod extended to ceiling height in an empty office fit-out, an access point mounted on its bracket and a battery pack clamped to the mast
Battery powered, on a stand, at ceiling height. No cabling, no containment and no commitment — the access point can be moved twenty times in a morning until the measurements say the position is right.
An Ekahau Sidekick 2 survey instrument, front on
This is what a survey is measured with. A calibrated radio and spectrum analyser carried through the building — not the Wi-Fi adapter in somebody's laptop, which reports what one consumer radio happens to see and calls it a reading.
The model and the building are not always the same building Predictive — modelled from drawings Even coverage. Assumes plasterboard throughout. On-site — measured in the building measured dead area neighbour's network Wall built in blockwork. Adjacent tenant on the same channels.
Neither approach is simply better — they answer different questions. Predictive modelling is the only option before a building exists, and it is accurate enough to budget and procure from. What it cannot know is how the building was actually built, what the neighbours are transmitting, or what interference the plant produces. On most projects of any size the sensible answer is both.

New to this? The plain-English reference explains what a survey measures, what the numbers mean and what you get, with a glossary — written to be forwarded to whoever is approving the spend.

The output is a document. That matters more than it sounds — it means you can put the work out to tender on equal terms, hand it to a contractor and get a comparable price, or hold the installer to a defined standard when it goes in. Without one, you are buying an opinion.

The problems a survey solves

  • Coverage that fails under load. Signal strength and capacity are different things. A site can have full bars everywhere and still fall over at shift change because the design counted square metres instead of devices.
  • Dead spots nobody can explain. Usually a construction material, a mezzanine, or racking that was empty when the network went in and is full now.
  • Roaming that drops sessions. Handheld scanners, voice handsets and AGVs are far less tolerant than a laptop. They need overlapping coverage designed deliberately, at the right signal levels, with the right roaming thresholds.
  • Interference you can't see. Neighbouring networks, non-Wi-Fi sources, and your own access points fighting each other because everything is set to maximum power on overlapping channels.
  • Quotes you can't compare. Three suppliers proposing three different access point counts, and no way to judge which is right. A survey gives everyone the same specification to price.
  • Money spent on the wrong fix. More access points is the standard remedy and often the wrong one — it can make a capacity problem measurably worse.

Who it's for

Commercial organisations with a coverage or capacity problem, or a project where getting it wrong is expensive: warehouses and distribution centres, offices and fit-outs, schools and colleges, hotels and hospitality venues, care settings, managed and multi-tenant property, marinas, event venues and retail. We work UK-wide.

We do not do residential broadband support. Everything on this site is commercial work.

Choosing

Which survey do you need?

Most projects use more than one. Here's the honest version — including when you don't need us on site at all.

Your situationThe survey you needWhy
New building, fit-out or extension — nothing installed yetPredictiveThere is no building to measure. We model it from the drawings and the construction schedule, so the cabling and containment can be designed into the fit-out rather than chased afterwards.
Existing building, replacing or extending the networkOn-site, usually after a predictive passReal walls attenuate differently to drawings, and your neighbours' networks are already using the spectrum. Measuring beats modelling once the building exists.
Network installed and underperformingTroubleshooting surveyDiagnostic rather than design-led. We measure what is happening, isolate the cause, and tell you what it takes to fix it — which is sometimes configuration rather than hardware.
Installation just finished, or a contractor's work to sign offValidationProves the installed network meets the design. This is the survey that turns a coverage promise into evidence, and the one most people skip.
Coverage was fine, then the business changedOn-site, scoped as a health checkMore people, taller racking, a mezzanine, a new device fleet. The building changed; the design didn't.

Not sure? Ring us and describe the building — it's a five minute conversation and it usually settles it, with no charge and no obligation. If you'd rather work through it in writing, the pre-survey questionnaire covers the same ground and gets you a fixed price.

Survey types

Every survey type, explained properly

Each of these has its own page, because each one answers a different question.

The model and the building are not always the same building Predictive — modelled from drawings Even coverage. Assumes plasterboard throughout. On-site — measured in the building measured dead area neighbour's network Wall built in blockwork. Adjacent tenant on the same channels.

Predictive survey

Modelled from your drawings before anything is bought or built.

Best for: Before the building exists, or before anything is bought

You get: AP count, positions and a budget figure

Coverage plot — signal strength (RSSI) AP-01 AP-02 AP-03 weak corner Signal −50 dBm −60 −67 −75 −85 Design target Laptops −67 dBm Scanners −65 dBm Walls shown in dark grey. Access point positions marked AP-01 to AP-03. Illustrative diagram — not client survey data

On-site survey

Measured in the building, with the walls, racking and people that are actually there.

Best for: An existing building, with the walls and racking as they really are

You get: Measured coverage, SNR and a channel plan

Validation compares what was designed against what was built Design target 100% of the designated area at −65 dBm or better. Measured after installation below target AP-03 relocated on site Fail. Remedy: reposition AP-03 and re-test that zone. The gap between these two pictures is the entire reason a coverage guarantee is worth anything.

Validation survey

Run after installation to prove the design was delivered.

Best for: After installation, before you sign it off

You get: Measured proof against the design

Strong signal is not the same as enough capacityOne access pointSixteen devices, one channelch 3696% usedAirtime: saturatedSignal strong everywhere — and it still crawlsThree access points, three channelsThe same sixteen devices, three times the airtimech 36ch 44ch 5234% usedAirtime: headroom leftSame devices, same signal, room to grow

Heatmapping

The coverage plots themselves — and what the colours really mean.

Best for: Any survey — this is how the results are drawn

You get: Coverage plots with the threshold stated

Adding access points without a channel plan makes things worse Same channel, full power ch 36 ch 36 ch 36 Three radios all waiting for the same airtime. More hardware, less usable capacity. Planned channels, managed power ch 36 ch 44 ch 52 Overlap kept deliberate — enough for roaming, not enough to contend.

Ekahau surveys

The tooling the whole method runs on, and who's certified to use it.

Best for: Every survey we run, predictive and on site

You get: Calibrated measurement and spectrum analysis

What the report contains 1Introduction — scope and constraints2Test equipment and method3Assessment considerations4Access point placement — plots per band5Placement photographs6Neighbouring networks7Recommended bill of materials Illustrative diagram — not client survey data

The report

Exactly what lands in your inbox at the end.

Best for: Deciding whether a survey is worth commissioning

You get: A seven-part report you can tender from

Signal travels down an aisle. It does not travel across the racking. Plan view — loaded racking, viewed from above AP strong down the aisle weaker one bay across two bays across: little left racking bay (loaded) usable coverage

What it costs

The seven things that move the price.

Best for: Budgeting, or comparing two quotations

You get: The seven things that move the price

Roaming has to be designed, not assumed Insufficient overlap — the session drops still clinging to AP-01… …drops here walking route Designed overlap — clean handover overlap zone stays connected

What is a Wi-Fi survey?

The plain-English reference, if you are new to commissioning one.

Best for: Anyone commissioning a survey for the first time

You get: The vocabulary, in plain English

Mounting height changes the answer as much as the hardware does Cross-section — high-bay warehouse roof steel · 12 m floor · pick level mounted at roof level wide footprint, weak at the floor racking top · 6 m mounted below racking top smaller footprint, strong where it matters

Pre-survey questionnaire

Ten minutes of questions and we can scope and price it properly.

Best for: Getting a fixed price without a site visit first

You get: A scoped, costed survey proposal

Process

How a survey runs

Four stages. You get something usable at the end of each one, and you can stop after any of them.

1

Scope

A conversation about the building, the devices, what's failing and when. Often enough to tell you which survey you need — and occasionally enough to tell you that you don't need one.

2

Measure

On-site with Ekahau, predictive from drawings, or both. We capture coverage, signal-to-noise, interference, channel use, capacity and roaming behaviour.

3

Design & report

Access point positions and mounting detail, channel and power plan, capacity modelling, cabling and containment schedule, costed kit list with part numbers.

4

Install & validate

If you want us to build it, our teams do — then we survey it again and hand you the evidence that it meets the design.

Outputs

What you get at the end

A survey is only worth what its report is worth. Ours is written so a facilities manager can read it, a finance director can budget from it, and an installer can build from it without ringing us for clarification.

Walk through a real report
  • Coverage plots per floor at the signal levels your devices need — not one generous threshold for everything
  • Signal-to-noise and interference plots, so you can see what you're competing with
  • Access point positions with mounting height, orientation and fixing detail
  • Channel and transmit-power plan, including behaviour alongside neighbouring networks
  • Capacity modelling against your real device counts and applications
  • Cabling and containment schedule so the installation can be priced, not discovered
  • Costed kit list with part numbers, so quotes can be compared like for like
  • A written summary in plain English, for the people approving the spend

The equipment we survey with

Surveys are run on Ekahau — the toolset most of this industry designs and validates against — using calibrated survey adapters and spectrum analysis rather than a laptop's built-in radio. On-site work uses a scaled, calibrated floorplan so measurements land in the right place on the drawing. Where a building doesn't exist yet, the same platform models it from your architectural drawings and a wall-material schedule.

Coverage plot — signal strength (RSSI) AP-01 AP-02 AP-03 weak corner Signal −50 dBm −60 −67 −75 −85 Design target Laptops −67 dBm Scanners −65 dBm Walls shown in dark grey. Access point positions marked AP-01 to AP-03. Illustrative diagram — not client survey data
A coverage plot only means something once you know its threshold. The same measured data drawn at −75 dBm would look almost entirely strong. Drawn at −65 dBm, which is roughly what a handheld scanner needs to work reliably, the far corner fails. Our reports state the threshold on every plot, and produce separate plots per device class where a site runs a mixed fleet.

On the design side we are deliberately vendor-independent. We work regularly with Cisco Meraki, Ruckus CommScope, Cambium Networks, Ubiquiti UniFi and more, and we specify whatever the measured data says the building needs. If your existing platform can do the job, the report will say so.

Why choose SEGwifi

  • We install what we specify. Most Wi-Fi specialists survey and hand over. We keep the containment, cabling, mounting, commissioning and validation in house — so the design doesn't get diluted by whoever ends up fitting it.
  • The report is written to be used. Enough detail for an installer to work from, in language the people approving the spend can follow.
  • We validate. A validation survey after installation, and a coverage guarantee with written thresholds behind it.
  • Procurement-ready. CHAS, Constructionline Gold, SafeContractor and TrustMark through The Specialist Electrical Group, with RAMS, insurance and site paperwork as standard.
  • Group capacity. Access to a broader range of engineers and installers when a programme needs more hands on site.
  • Commercial only. No residential work, no distraction.
FAQ

Common questions

Wi-Fi survey, WiFi survey, wireless site survey — are they the same thing?

Yes. Wireless site survey is the older, more formal term and the one you will see on a specification or in a tender document. Wi-Fi survey and WiFi survey are the same job described the way most people actually say it. An Ekahau survey names the toolset rather than a different service, and a WiFi heatmap survey names one of the outputs. They all describe measuring a building's radio environment so a wireless network can be designed from evidence instead of assumption.

What genuinely differs is not the name but the method: whether the survey is modelled from drawings, measured on site with a real access point, or run after installation to prove the design was delivered. Ask a supplier which of those they are quoting for — the price difference between them is large, and so is the difference in what you can build from.

Predictive or on-site — which one do I actually need?

If the building exists, on-site measurement will always beat modelling, because it captures the walls as built, the racking as loaded and the neighbouring networks as they really are. Predictive is the right answer when there is nothing to measure yet, or when you need a budget figure before committing. On most projects of any size we do a predictive design first to shape the budget, then validate and adjust it on site.

How long does a survey take?

A single-floor office is typically a day on site with the report a few days later. A large distribution centre, a multi-building estate or a site with significant outdoor coverage takes longer. Racking density and access arrangements matter more than floor area — a full warehouse takes longer to survey than an empty one twice the size. You'll have a timescale before you commit.

Do you need to shut anything down?

No. Surveying is passive measurement — we're listening, not reconfiguring. We do need physical access to the areas being surveyed, including plant rooms and anywhere at height, and we'll need to know about restricted or hazardous areas in advance. Occupied buildings, live warehouses and out-of-hours working are all routine.

What do you need from us before you arrive?

Floorplans (CAD or PDF, ideally to scale), a rough device count and what those devices do, any known problem areas, details of the existing network if there is one, and site access arrangements including any induction requirements. If you don't have drawings we can work from what you've got — it just adds time.

Will the survey tell us to replace everything?

Not unless it has to. A significant share of the sites we survey have hardware that is perfectly capable and was simply never commissioned properly — every radio at full power, overlapping channels, default roaming thresholds. Where that's the case the report says so and the fix is engineering time, not capital spend. Where the kit genuinely can't do the job, you get the measurements that prove it.

Can we use the report to get competitive quotes?

Yes, and we'd encourage it. The report is a specification: access point count and positions, kit list with part numbers, cabling schedule. Any competent installer can price from it. We think we'll win the install on merit, but the survey is yours either way.

Do you survey outdoor areas?

Yes — yards, car parks, quaysides, pontoons, campuses and open ground. Outdoor coverage has different design constraints: weatherproofing, mounting, lightning protection, power and containment to remote positions, and RF behaviour over water or across open space. It's specified separately because it costs differently.

Is this different from a network audit?

Yes. A network audit looks at switching, routing, security and configuration. A Wi-Fi survey looks at radio. They overlap — capacity problems are sometimes an uplink problem wearing a Wi-Fi costume — and where we find that, the report will say so plainly rather than selling you access points you don't need.

Let's find out what your Wi-Fi is actually doing.

Book a survey and you get measured data, a design you can build to, and a number you can budget against — not an opinion.